Find it in the files, not the field.
Machine-speed analysis of technical specifications. Find contradictions, gaps, and duplicates before sign-off.
Find it in the files, not the field.
Machine-speed analysis of technical specifications. Find contradictions, gaps, and duplicates before sign-off.
Requirements Management
DOORS Next, Jama Connect, Codebeamer, Polarion, and every other requirements management system on the market are built to author, baseline, and trace requirements. None of them score a requirement for ambiguity, catch a contradiction between two approved requirements, or flag a duplicate written in different words. Wyzer Detective is the specification-quality and compliance gate that runs on top, on the requirement set you already manage there.
The category exists to solve authoring, versioning, and traceability at scale, the structural side of managing a specification.
Structured requirement authoring with mandatory fields, ID formats, and versioned baselines, so a requirement set has a defined, auditable state at every gate.
Bidirectional links between requirements, tests, and downstream artefacts, so an assessor can follow a requirement from system spec through to test evidence.
Approval gates, reviewer assignment, and status transitions that move a requirement set through structured sign-off.
Structural enforcement confirms a field is filled in. It says nothing about whether the requirement inside that field is vague, redundant, or contradicts another one three chapters away.
Logical, numeric, and semantic conflicts between requirements that each read correctly in isolation, the class of defect that survives structural review because no single reviewer holds the whole document in working memory.
Every requirement scored on Ambiguity, Measurability, Conciseness, and Completeness, the things mandatory-field validation checks for existence, not quality.
Semantically redundant requirements clustered by meaning, even when two teams wrote them in entirely different vocabulary.
Requirements classified across functional, safety, performance, and compliance domains, so gaps surface before sign-off, not during an audit or a supplier dispute.
Not limited to Wyzer's own standards. Upload a competitor spec, an internal template, or a prior baseline instead, and every requirement in your set comes back scored against it.
ReqIF is the integration interface, so the manual export-and-upload workflow works with any RM system today. These four have a dedicated guide for the specifics of that export.
Keep DOORS Next as your system of record. Add Wyzer as the quality gate it doesn't have.
See how it fits →Jama ConnectJama Connect tracks requirements. Wyzer checks whether they contradict each other.
See how it fits →PTC CodebeamerCodebeamer tracks your requirements. Wyzer checks whether they're sound.
See how it fits →PolarionPolarion manages the lifecycle. Wyzer catches what the lifecycle tool can't.
See how it fits →Two things a requirements management system was never built to measure.
Every requirement gets scored on six axes: Ambiguity, Measurability, Conciseness, and Completeness, plus conformance to INCOSE and EARS writing rules, detailed on the Sherlock engine page , axes a mandatory-field check has no way to evaluate. Compliance Evaluation checks those same requirements against obligations from a standard, either one you supply or Wyzer's built-in coverage, which is expanding, with ISO 26262 and ASPICE on the roadmap. Specification Benchmarking answers a related but different question: not "does this meet the standard" but "how does this compare to the document I chose", a prior baseline, an internal template, or something else entirely. See the full capability list on the product overview.
No. Wyzer Detective is not a system of record and does not do authoring, baselining, or traceability. It runs alongside the requirements management system you already use, as a quality and compliance gate on the requirement set that system stores.
No. Your existing RM system stays exactly as it is. Export a ReqIF baseline from it, run that export through Wyzer Detective, and bring the findings back into the review process you already run there.
Any requirements management tool that exports ReqIF, the OMG-standard Requirements Interchange Format supported by every major RM system. Dedicated integration guides exist today for IBM DOORS Next, Jama Connect, Codebeamer, and Polarion.
Yes. Run it as a step inside the ASPICE process you already have, before a formal gate review rather than during one, and it surfaces the contradictions, ambiguity, and traceability gaps an assessor would otherwise find first. Compliance Evaluation adds a second layer: gaps against reference-standard obligations, either a standard you supply or Wyzer's built-in coverage, where ISO 26262 and ASPICE are on the roadmap. Neither is a certification claim, and there's no certification-check today for ISO 21434 or DO-178C.
Same day. Export a ReqIF baseline, upload it, and Sherlock returns quality scores, contradictions, and coverage gaps within minutes. No configuration, no training data, no integration project.
No. Customer data is not used to train the system and is not exposed to other customers or external models. Data is encrypted at rest.
In the EU. Wyzer's infrastructure runs in an EU region, isolated to your environment, with standard retention capped at 90 days by default.
No practical one. Sherlock has been tested to tens of thousands of requirements with no degradation in output quality: it processes specifications in parallel batches rather than reading them end to end.
No. Reviewers keep working in the requirements tool they already use. Wyzer Detective runs before or alongside the existing review, and relevant findings get applied back into that review. It's a quality-gate step, not a new system to adopt.
Credit-based pricing that scales with the number of requirements in your specification and how complex they are (plain text vs. requirements with tables or diagrams). There's no fixed per-seat licence. Get in touch for a quote sized to your specification.
Yes. Any ReqIF export works as the reference: a published standard, an internal template, last year's baseline, whatever you want the current spec measured against. The comparison runs requirement by requirement, not as a single aggregate score, so you can see exactly which ones fall short.
Export a ReqIF baseline from the requirements management system you already use and get a full Wyzer Detective analysis within minutes: quality scores, contradictions, and coverage gaps.
← Back to product overview