Find it in the files, not the field.
Machine-speed analysis of technical specifications. Find contradictions, gaps, and duplicates before sign-off.
Find it in the files, not the field.
Machine-speed analysis of technical specifications. Find contradictions, gaps, and duplicates before sign-off.
Augmenting Polarion
Polarion enforces process: approval gates, LiveDoc structure, mandated review steps. None of that tells you whether two approved requirements quietly contradict each other. Wyzer Detective checks that before the document leaves your team.
Approval gates, status transitions, and role-based permissions enforced at the item level.
Requirements authored inside structured documents with live traceability to linked work items.
Deep integration with Teamcenter and the broader Siemens Xcelerator toolchain.
Runs on the requirement set you already maintain in Polarion. No migration, no new system of record.
An approval gate confirms a reviewer signed off, not that two approved requirements agree. Wyzer checks the whole baseline before it enters the next gate.
LiveDocs show the structure you authored. Wyzer classifies requirements across functional, safety, performance, and compliance domains to show which domains have none.
Compare a baseline against a prior baseline or an internal template, requirement by requirement, before the next approval gate.
Two ways to run Wyzer Detective against a Polarion baseline today.
Export a ReqIF baseline from Polarion, from the LiveDoc or work item set entering the next approval gate.
Upload the file to Wyzer Detective. No configuration, no template mapping. Sherlock reads the ReqIF structure as-is.
Sherlock scores every requirement, then cross-references the whole baseline for contradictions, duplicates, and coverage gaps, in the window between one approval gate and the next.
Review the structured findings report and resolve what matters in Polarion before the baseline enters the next approval gate.
Rather than a manual export-and-upload step, Wyzer Detective connects directly to wherever your Polarion baseline lives, triggered automatically when it changes, with findings returned via API into your existing tooling. API-based integration isn't self-serve yet. Talk to us and we'll wire it into your rollout. .
Wyzer Detective's integration interface is ReqIF, the OMG-standard Requirements Interchange Format, and the same baseline export Polarion already produces. Working from Markdown, Excel, Word, or PDF-style specifications instead? Wyzer partners with specification-standardization providers who convert those into clean ReqIF input first.
Not as a replacement. Wyzer Detective is not a requirements management system, so it doesn't author, baseline, or trace requirements. If you are evaluating Polarion alternatives because quality problems keep slipping through review, Wyzer adds the missing quality gate on top of the Polarion you already run: it scores every requirement and finds contradictions, duplicates, and coverage gaps across the baseline.
No. Polarion stays your workflow and LiveDoc platform. Export the baseline you already manage in Polarion, run it through Wyzer Detective, and resolve findings before the next approval gate, and the workflow itself doesn't change.
No. Run Wyzer Detective on the baseline before it enters Polarion's approval gate, so findings get resolved before the workflow's review steps start, not instead of them.
Same day. Export a ReqIF baseline, upload it, and Sherlock returns quality scores, contradictions, and coverage gaps within minutes. No configuration, no training data, no integration project.
No. Customer data is not used to train the system and is not exposed to other customers or external models. Data is encrypted at rest.
In the EU. Wyzer's infrastructure runs in an EU region, isolated to your environment, with standard retention capped at 90 days by default.
No practical one. Sherlock has been tested to tens of thousands of requirements with no degradation in output quality: it processes specifications in parallel batches rather than reading them end to end.
No. Reviewers keep working in the requirements tool they already use. Wyzer Detective runs before or alongside the existing review, and relevant findings get applied back into that review. It's a quality-gate step, not a new system to adopt.
Credit-based pricing that scales with the number of requirements in your specification and how complex they are (plain text vs. requirements with tables or diagrams). There's no fixed per-seat licence. Get in touch for a quote sized to your specification. Searching a finished analysis with a defect or failure description (the Requirement Scan API, in beta) costs one credit per query, whatever the size of the specification.
Yes. Any ReqIF export works as the reference: a published standard, an internal template, last year's baseline, whatever you want the current spec measured against. The comparison runs requirement by requirement, not as a single aggregate score, so you can see exactly which ones fall short.
Export a ReqIF baseline from Polarion and get a full Wyzer Detective analysis within minutes: quality scores, contradictions, and coverage gaps.
← Back to product overview